Muckrakers and Whistleblowers Must Not Be Prosecuted!
By Alagi Yorro Jallow
Fatoumatta: The Washington Post’s slogan, “Democracy dies in darkness,” is a good start, but a more populist appeal might be more effective: What are the politicians hiding from you? What do they not want you to know? Have they forgotten they work for you?
Once that point is made, there will be an opportunity to remind the public that this is the muckrakers of the progressive era; the age of embracing whistleblowers; and this is the point of investigative journalism: to provide information, to challenge, dig, shed light, and to expose. As H.L. Mencken once said, “Journalism is to a politician as dog is to a lamp-post.” Not a bad lesson for journalists themselves to re-learn.
Journalists and whistleblowers may regard the case for transparency in government as self-evident, but the case can and should be made anew. The past and current government’s era provides an opportunity to go back to first principles and remind the public why the freedom of the press is enshrined in the Constitution.
Fatoumatta: Transparency is a virtue, anyone who acts in secrecy and fears the day his or her actions are exposed knows what they do is wrong. We should appreciate the role of investigative muckrakers, whistleblowers, the leakers, and anyone who exposes truth. We should use the truth to determine our own informed response and demand transparency from those who profess to represent us.
In 2017, A responsible legal person Mr. Bubabcarr AMO Badjie, the Director of Legal Affairs of the Gambia’s State Intelligence Service, SIS exercised his duty to the public by blowing the whistle on what appears to be alleged misuse of power and abuse of office. Instead, Mr. Badjie the whistleblower was arrested for alleged providing of information to journalists.
Lawyer Badjie was accused of allegedly leaked a petition document he wrote to President Barrow and published in online media.He exposed the high level of corruption at the country’s Intelligence Agency – State Intelligence Services (SIS)- and the incompetence of its staff. He also cited the agency of having a 60 per cent workforce that is “functionally illiterate” and can neither read nor understand the English Language. He said the usefulness of such people as Intel agents is very insignificant as most of them cannot write comprehensive English Language nor understand it. This undemocratic action is in violation of the principles of transparency and openness in government.
Fatoumatta: The Gambian people should Strongly recommend that the National Assembly, as part of their oversight function, enact coherent and comprehensive legislation on the protection of both muckrakers and whistleblowers in line with international standards and best practices. Muckrakers and whistleblowers should never be prosecuted for exposing the unlawful practices of our government. They are courageous and should be protected, not punished! Instead they should be protected and rewarded for expose and publishes the misdeeds, such as criminal acts or corruption, of a public individual for profit or gain.
Fatoumatta: Prosecution of muckrakers and whistle blowers is dangerous. The principles of transparency and openness are at great risk if we continue to allow governments to seek out and prosecute those who leak important and revealing information for the benefit and information of the people.
Fatoumatta: It is the duty of the people to hold their governments to account. Investigative muckrakers and whistleblowers play a key role in enabling this scrutiny through transparency. As citizens, as free businesses, and as a species that requires social interaction and connectivity to thrive, we should all do more to protect and reward them.
Fatoumatta: Muckrakers and whistleblowers perform an essential service in ensuring transparency – often where government would keep us in the dark. There are at present very few means by which wrongdoing within government agencies can be exposed, and therefore it falls to individuals. There is no question that protecting national security is important, but public interest journalism and individual ethics have their place in democracy alongside security and the law. Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter it or protest.
Fatoumatta: The Official Secrets Act (OSA) of 1922 obstructs the participation of society as it shields information from the public by means of criminalizing whistleblowers and journalists who expose corruption and mismanagement to the media and public.
By limiting the reporting of corruption to authorities, the Official Secrets Act (OSA) of 1922 promotes an environment that breeds corruption primarily because secrecy allows for cases to be squashed without an explanation.
On the other hand, exposing corruption to the public creates a democratic space which holds the authorities accountable at every stage of the investigation. This is a pre-requisite for any serious endeavor in cutting corruption in this country.
As such, by criminalizing whistleblowers and by perpetuating an atmosphere that accelerates corrupt practices, the Gambia increasingly losing its credibility as a democratic nation that upholds justice in a transparent and accountable manner. The Gambian people must call upon the authorities to stop harassing members of the public and alike, who blow the whistle on corrupt practices that can only destroy the health of our democracy.
Fatoumatta: The Civil Society should call upon the authorities concerned or the National Assembly to review the Official Secret Act of 1922 and draw up a moratorium on using it against whistleblowers in cases of public interest. Members of the National Assembly of the Second Republic unanimously modified the Official Secret Act at the second meeting of the Assembly in the 2008 Legislative year. Presenting the bill for modification, Aja Isatou Njie-Saidy, then Vice President and secretary of state for Women’s Affairs recalled that, the Official Secret Act Modification Bill, defending and justifying the bill stated that the “object and intend of the modification “is to provide penalties for any unauthorized disclosure of official information’s and documents including spying, using of official secret codes and passwords as well as the use of unauthorized retention, possession or use of official documents”. Democracy in the digital era and the threat to Privacy and Individual Freedoms We should strongly condemn the authorities for any rash action to arrest and prosecute journalists, muckrakers and whistleblowers under the provisions of the colonial law Official Secrets Act (OSA) 1922.